Session S67b (Wednesday, 2pm, CHEM 102)

P834: Researchers' perceptions of self-assembly: Capturing a field in scientific revolution

MaryKay Orgill, Thomas Bussey (University of Nevada – Las Vegas, USA), Kent Crippen (University of Florida, USA), Wendy Ho, Cindy Kern, Megan Litster, Sarah Wood (University of Nevada – Las Vegas, USA)

Self-assembly has received a significant amount of attention in both the research literature and the popular press as of late. In fact, self-assembly has been described as one of the “big ideas” underpinning nanoscience, and an entire issue of Science was devoted to “Supramolecular Chemistry and Self-Assembly” in 2002. Despite the importance of self-assembly, there is no one general definition upon which researchers agree. This is reflective of the emergent nature of the field. In this project, we surveyed self-assembly researchers in order to identify the characteristics they use to define self-assembly (N = 323). These researchers were asked to provide their own definitions, respond to visual representations, and comment on others’ definitions of self-assembly. In this presentation, we will discuss the genesis and implementation of this research project. We will also share examples of researchers’ own definitions of self-assembly and discuss the implications of the variation in their responses.


A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.